|
Here are some Great Tricks!!!
10 Youtube URL Tricks You Should Know About: 1. View high quality videos 2. Embed Higher Quality Videos 3. Cut the chase and link to the interesting part 4. Hide the search box 5. Embed only a part of Video 6. Autoplay an embedded video 7. Loop an embedded video 8. Disable Related Videos 9. Bypass Youtube Regional Filtering 10. Download Video 1. View high quality videos Youtube gives you the option to switch to high quality videos for some of the videos, however you can check if a video is available in high quality format by appending ‘&fmt=18′(stereo, 480 x 270 resolution) or ‘&fmt=22′(stereo, 1280 x 720 resolution) for even higher quality. 2. Embed Higher Quality Videos While the above trick works for playback, if however you want to embed hig quality videos you need to append “&ap=%2526fmt%3D18″ and “&ap=%2526fmt%3D22″ to the embed url. 3. Cut the chase and link to the interesting part Linking to a video where the real action starts at 3 minutes 22 seconds, wondered if you could make it start at 03:22? You are in luck. All you have to do is add #t=03m22s (#t=XXmYYs for XX mins and YY seconds) to the end of the URL. 4. Hide the search box The search box appears when you hover over an embedded video. To hide the search box add ‘&showsearch=0′ to the embed url. 5. Embed only a part of Video Just append ‘&start=30′ to skip first 30s of the video. In general you can modify the value after start= to the number of seconds you want to skip the video for. 6. Autoplay an embedded video Normally when you embed a Youtube video and load the page, the player is loaded and it sits there waiting for you to hit the play button. You can make the video play automatically by adding ‘&autoplay=1′ to the url part of the embed code. 7. Loop an embedded video Append ‘&loop=1′ to make the video start again without user intervention after it reaches the end. 8. Disable Related Videos Publishing your content in the form of Youtube video? Don’t want people to see other people’s content that may be related but may as well be in competition to you? Just add ‘&rel=0′ to the end of the url part of the embed code and you just turned off the related video suggestions! 9. Bypass Youtube Regional Filtering Some videos are only available in certain parts of the world. Your IP Address is used to determine your location and then allow or deny access to the video. Change the url from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=<somecode> to http://www.youtube.com/v/<somecode> 10. Download Video Although not inherently a youtube trick but useful all the same for downloading videos. Just change youtube to kickyoutube in the url of the video and it will take you to kickyoutube.com with all the options for downloading the video you were watching. All these can be found Here: http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/10-youtube-url-tricks-you-should-know-about/ There are some extra graphics on the site to help with the explanations!</somecode></somecode> http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/digitalnation/
So this is my first post on sift talk, and I thought I would try and wait until I had something that I suspect would interest most of you. If you haven't seen it already, PBS and Frontline are putting together a pretty fascinating online series of documentaries centered around the idea that what will ultimately define our age is digital technology. Frontline has done some docs like this one before, but this one is particularly cool because its content and its primary mode of exhibition are married. So far they have released two "chapters." I guess they are going by country, because part one deals with Korea... specifically with video games and video game/internet addiction. The second chapter deals with America's emergent robotic military. The other thing I wanted to bring up is actually a question for the veteran sifters and I guess Dag specifically. PBS video has embed codes; is it possible to post these? I couldn't get it to work. ;( Cheers! 1. “There is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home.” — Ken Olson, president, chairman and founder of Digital Equipment Corp. (DEC), maker of big business mainframe computers, arguing against the PC in 1977.
2. “We will never make a 32 bit operating system.” — Bill Gates 3. “Lee DeForest has said in many newspapers and over his signature that it would be possible to transmit the human voice across the Atlantic before many years. Based on these absurd and deliberately misleading statements, the misguided public … has been persuaded to purchase stock in his company …” — a U.S. District Attorney, prosecuting American inventor Lee DeForest for selling stock fraudulently through the mail for his Radio Telephone Company in 1913. 4. “There is practically no chance communications space satellites will be used to provide better telephone, telegraph, television, or radio service inside the United States.” — T. Craven, FCC Commissioner, in 1961 (the first commercial communications satellite went into service in 1965). 5. “To place a man in a multi-stage rocket and project him into the controlling gravitational field of the moon where the passengers can make scientific observations, perhaps land alive, and then return to earth – all that constitutes a wild dream worthy of Jules Verne. I am bold enough to say that such a man-made voyage will never occur regardless of all future advances.” — Lee DeForest, American radio pioneer and inventor of the vacuum tube, in 1926 6. “A rocket will never be able to leave the Earth’s atmosphere.” — New York Times, 1936. 7. “Flight by machines heavier than air is unpractical (sic) and insignificant, if not utterly impossible.” – Simon Newcomb; The Wright Brothers flew at Kittyhawk 18 months later. 8. “Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible.” — Lord Kelvin, British mathematician and physicist, president of the British Royal Society, 1895. 9. “There will never be a bigger plane built.” — A Boeing engineer, after the first flight of the 247, a twin engine plane that holds ten people 10. “Nuclear-powered vacuum cleaners will probably be a reality in 10 years.” -– Alex Lewyt, president of vacuum cleaner company Lewyt Corp., in the New York Times in 1955. 11. “This is the biggest fool thing we have ever done. The bomb will never go off, and I speak as an expert in explosives.” — Admiral William D. Leahy, Chief of Staff to the Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy during World War II, advising President Truman on the atomic bomb, 1945.[6] Leahy admitted the error five years later in his memoirs 12. “The energy produced by the breaking down of the atom is a very poor kind of thing. Anyone who expects a source of power from the transformation of these atoms is talking moonshine.” — Ernest Rutherford, shortly after splitting the atom for the first time. 13. “There is not the slightest indication that nuclear energy will ever be obtainable. It would mean that the atom would have to be shattered at will.” — Albert Einstein, 1932 14. “The cinema is little more than a fad. It’s canned drama. What audiences really want to see is flesh and blood on the stage.” -– Charlie Chaplin, actor, producer, director, and studio founder, 1916 15. “The horse is here to stay but the automobile is only a novelty – a fad.” — The president of the Michigan Savings Bank advising Henry Ford’s lawyer, Horace Rackham, not to invest in the Ford Motor Co., 1903 16. “The Americans have need of the telephone, but we do not. We have plenty of messenger boys.” — Sir William Preece, Chief Engineer, British Post Office, 1878. 17. “This ‘telephone’ has too many shortcomings to be seriously considered as a means of communication. The device is inherently of no value to us.” — A memo at Western Union, 1878 (or 1876). 18. “The world potential market for copying machines is 5000 at most.” — IBM, to the eventual founders of Xerox, saying the photocopier had no market large enough to justify production, 1959. 19. “I must confess that my imagination refuses to see any sort of submarine doing anything but suffocating its crew and floundering at sea.” — HG Wells, British novelist, in 1901. 20. “X-rays will prove to be a hoax.” — Lord Kelvin, President of the Royal Society, 1883. 21. “The idea that cavalry will be replaced by these iron coaches is absurd. It is little short of treasonous.” — Comment of Aide-de-camp to Field Marshal Haig, at tank demonstration, 1916. 22. “How, sir, would you make a ship sail against the wind and currents by lighting a bonfire under her deck? I pray you, excuse me, I have not the time to listen to such nonsense.” — Napoleon Bonaparte, when told of Robert Fulton’s steamboat, 1800s. 23. “Fooling around with alternating current is just a waste of time. Nobody will use it, ever.” — Thomas Edison, American inventor, 1889 (Edison often ridiculed the arguments of competitor George Westinghouse for AC power). 24. “Home Taping Is Killing Music” — A 1980s campaign by the BPI, claiming that people recording music off the radio onto cassette would destroy the music industry. 25. “Television won’t last. It’s a flash in the pan.” — Mary Somerville, pioneer of radio educational broadcasts, 1948. 26. “[Television] won’t be able to hold on to any market it captures after the first six months. People will soon get tired of staring at a plywood box every night.” — Darryl Zanuck, movie producer, 20th Century Fox, 1946. 27. “When the Paris Exhibition [of 1878] closes, electric light will close with it and no more will be heard of it.” – Oxford professor Erasmus Wilson 28. “Dear Mr. President: The canal system of this country is being threatened by a new form of transportation known as ‘railroads’ … As you may well know, Mr. President, ‘railroad’ carriages are pulled at the enormous speed of 15 miles per hour by ‘engines’ which, in addition to endangering life and limb of passengers, roar and snort their way through the countryside, setting fire to crops, scaring the livestock and frightening women and children. The Almighty certainly never intended that people should travel at such breakneck speed.” — Martin Van Buren, Governor of New York, 1830. 29. “Rail travel at high speed is not possible because passengers, unable to breathe, would die of asphyxia.” — Dr Dionysys Larder (1793-1859), professor of Natural Philosophy and Astronomy, University College London. 30. “The wireless music box has no imaginable commercial value. Who would pay for a message sent to no one in particular?” — Associates of David Sarnoff responding to the latter’s call for investment in the radio in 1921. taken from http://listverse.com/2007/10/28/top-30-failed-technology-predictions/ Dr. Steven Chu, the Nobel prize-winning physicist appointed by President Obama as Energy Secretary, wants to paint the world white. Chu said at the opening of the St James's Palace Nobel Laureate Symposium that by lightening paved surfaces and roofs to the color of cement, it would be possible to cut carbon emissions by as much as taking all the world's cars off the roads for 11 years. Pale surfaces reflect up to 80 percent of the sunlight that falls on them, compared with about 20 percent for dark ones, which is why roofs and walls in hot countries are often whitewashed.
An increase in pale surfaces would help to contain climate change both by reflecting more solar radiation into space and by reducing the amount of energy needed to keep buildings cool by air-conditioning. Since 2005 California has required all flat roofs on commercial buildings to be white and Georgia and Florida give incentives to owners who install white or light-colored roofs. Put another way, boosting how much urban rooftops reflect would be a one-time carbon-offset equivalent to preventing 44 billion tons of CO2 from entering the atmosphere. 'For the first time, we're equating the value of reflective roof surfaces and CO2 reduction,' says Dr. Hashem Akbari. 'This does not make the problem of global warming go away. But we can buy ourselves some time.'
http://news.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/05/27/1934245&from=rss The Great Ethanol Scam
Not only is ethanol proving to be a dud as a fuel substitute but there is increasing evidence that it is destroying engines in large numbers By Ed Wallace "Does the average citizen understand what this means? In from 10 to 20 years this country will be dependent entirely upon outside sources for a supply of liquid fuels … paying out vast sums yearly in order to obtain supplies of crude oil from Mexico, Russia, and Persia."—Yale Professor Harold Hibbert, ethanol promoter, 1925 More than one major transportation-based industry in America besides Detroit is on the ropes. For the fourth time in our history the ethanol industry has come undone and is quickly failing nationally. Of course it's one thing when Detroit collapsed with the economy; after all, that is a truly free-market enterprise and the economy hasn't been good. But the fact that the ethanol industry is going bankrupt, when the only reason we use this additive is a massive government mandate, is outrageous at best. Then again, the ethanol lobby and refiners have a solution to ethanol's failure in America: Hire retired General Wesley Clark as your point man and lobby the government to increase the amount of ethanol in our fuel to 15%. The problems with that proposition are real—unlike ethanol's benefits. Where's the Logic? First, the primary job of the Environmental Protection Agency is, dare it be said, to protect our environment. Yet using ethanol actually creates more smog than using regular gas, and the EPA's own attorneys had to admit that fact in front of the justices presiding over the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in 1995 (API v. EPA). Second, truly independent studies on ethanol, such as those written by Tad Patzek of Berkeley and David Pimentel of Cornell, show that ethanol is a net energy loser. Other studies suggest there is a small net energy gain from it. Third, all fuels laced with ethanol reduce the vehicle's fuel efficiency, and the E85 blend drops gas mileage between 30% and 40%, depending on whether you use the EPA's fuel mileage standards (fueleconomy.gov) or those of the Dept. of Energy. Fourth, forget what biofuels have done to the price of foodstuffs worldwide over the past three years; the science seems to suggest that using ethanol increases global warming emissions over the use of straight gasoline. Just these issues should have kept ethanol from being brought back for its fourth run in American history. Don't let anybody mislead you: The new push to get a 15% ethanol mandate out of Washington is simply to restore profitability to a failed industry. Only this time around those promoting more ethanol in our gas say there's no scientific proof that adding more ethanol will damage vehicles or small gas-powered engines. With that statement they've gone from shilling the public to outright falsehoods, because ethanol-laced gasoline is already destroying engines across the country in ever larger numbers. Got a Spare $1,000? Last July was bad enough for motorists on a budget—gasoline prices had shot up to more than $4 a gallon. But for some the pain in the pocketbook was about to get worse. At City Garage in Euless, Tex., for example, the first of numerous future customers brought in an automobile whose fuel pump was shot. A quick diagnosis determined that that particular car had close to 18% ethanol in the fuel. For that unlucky owner, the repairs came to nearly $900. The ethanol fun was just beginning. City Garage manager Eric Greathouse has found that adding ethanol to the nation's gasoline supply may be a foolish government mandate, but it has an upside he'd rather not deal with. It's supplying his shop with a slow but steady stream of customers whose plastic fuel intakes have been dissolved by the blending of ethanol into our gasoline, or their fuel pumps destroyed. The average cost of repairs is just shy of $1,000. It gets better. Scott Morrison is the owner of the City Garage chain in North Texas and he related the story of his technical director's run-in with ethanol; in December he filled up his E85 Flex Fuel Chevy Suburban at the Exxon station in Ovilla, just south of Dallas. His Suburban died on the spot, because even an E85-equipped vehicle will not run on the 100% pure ethanol that Exxon station was pumping that day. In that case it was not Exxon's fault but a mistake at the distribution center, and Exxon (XOM) quickly made good for the cost of repairs. On Jan. 16 of this year, Lexus ordered a massive recall of certain 2006 to 2008 models, including the GS Series, IS and LS sedans. According to the recall notice, the problem is that "Ethanol fuels with low moisture content will corrode the internal surface of the fuel rails." In layman's terms, ethanol causes pinpoint leaks in the fuel system; when leaking fuel catches your engine on fire, that's an exciting way to have your insurance company buy your Lexus. Using ethanol will cost Toyota (TM) untold millions. An Unpublicized Trend Though the media is ignoring it, one can easily find many stories on BMW (BMWG.DE) blogs relating similar problems with fuel systems damaged by the use of ethanol. Certainly that was the case with Christi Jordan and her 2007 Mini. For weeks it was difficult to start; Moritz BMW in Arlington, Tex., inspected it and found severe carbon buildup inside the engine. On her second trip to the mechanics they decided to test the ethanol content of Christi's fuel and found it was much higher than the federally mandated limit of 10%. This time the fuel pump had been destroyed by the ethanol. The repair bill came to $1,200: As in all cases where vehicles are damaged by ethanol, legally the factory warranty no longer applied. Jim Keppler, Moritz's fixed operations director, said he's had at least 10 other cases of ethanol poisoning in Minis over the past six months. Christi was one of the lucky ones; Moritz covered her repairs. But there's no telling how many motorists across the nation have had to pay for fuel pumps, or fuel systems, that ethanol damaged. Most were probably unaware of the real culprit behind the breakdown, because virtually no repair shop tests the level of ethanol in the gasoline when these fuel system problems occur. And there are active lawsuits from boat owners; ethanol broke down the resins in their fiberglass gas tanks, destroying their marine engines. Additionally, those who deal in small gas engines for lawnmowers, edgers, and weedeaters have quickly learned that, as Briggs & Stratton's (BGG) Web site warns, "Ethanol-blended gasoline can attract moisture, which leads to separation and formation of acids during storage. Acidic gasoline can damage the fuel system of an engine while in storage. B&S strongly recommends removing ethanol-blended fuels from engine during storage." Like motorists, if landscaping tool owners put gasoline with more than 10% ethanol in their small engines, that immediately voids any factory warranties. In the case of the Lexus recall, using just a 10% ethanol blend was found to be destroying many of these engines also. Another Government-Mandated Mistake It now appears that in just a few years since the government forced ethanol use on the country, engine and fuel system failures caused by ethanol are causing major damage to more and more new and used vehicles. This means the hapless owners are not only paying for snake oil in lower fuel efficiency and more smog, but pay again when it damages their vehicles and lawn mowers. We seem to have forgotten, but the promise of turning over farmland for fuel production was to reduce our nation's demand for imported crude. But until this massive economic slowdown, as Gusher of Lies (PublicAffairs, 2008) author Robert Bryce pointed out, even while the ethanol mandate was being ramped up we were increasing our imports of foreign oil. Translation: The entire politically stated purpose of using ethanol had already been proven to be a false one before the program even got fully under way. No surprise there. The premise that ethanol could give America the freedom to one day stop importing oil has always been fraudulent. Another fun fact: If we outlawed gasoline and diesel, thereby removing every last car, truck and SUV from our highways—no vehicles anywhere on any road in the country—America would still have to import oil because we would still use more crude than domestic production can supply. Why is that? Crude oil is also used to make fertilizers, aviation fuel, home heating oil, and many other products. Not to mention polyester suits for car salesmen. Comment Now, Public! Pushed into it by the corn growers' and ethanol refiners' lobbying organizations, today the EPA is starting to go through the public comment phase on increasing the level of ethanol in our gasoline from 10% to 15%. Time and time again we have heard from these groups, who now claim that there is zero scientific evidence that a 15% blend of ethanol would do any damage whatsoever if the mandate for ethanol were raised. As with all statements made by vested interests, few outsiders have actually taken the time to look and find out whether this statement was true. In fact, it's false. Not one mechanic I've spoken with said they would be comfortable with a 15% blend of ethanol in their personal car. However, most suggest that if the government moves the ethanol mandate to 15%, it will be the dawn of a new golden age for auto mechanics' income. One last thought: Most individuals who have had to repair their fuel systems in recent years never had the gasoline tested to see if the ethanol percentage might be the problem. Today most repair shops and new-car dealers are still not testing for ethanol blends. They're simply repairing the vehicles and sending their unhappy and less wealthy customers on their way. But, where dealer and repair shops are testing the gasoline, ethanol is becoming one of the leading culprits for the damage. Sadly, when a truly bad idea is exposed today, Washington's answer is to double-down on the bet, mandate more of the same, and make the problem worse. Only this time around motorists will be able to gauge the real cost of ethanol when it comes time to fix their personal cars. Ed Wallace is a recipient of the the Gerald R. Loeb Award for business journalism, given by the G. and R. Loeb Foundation, and is a member of the American Historical Society. His column leads the Fort Worth Star-Telegram's "Sunday Drive" section. He reviews new cars every Friday morning at 7:15 on Fox Four's Good Day, contributes articles to BusinessWeek Online, and hosts the top-rated talk show Wheels Saturdays from 8 a.m. to 1 p.m. on 570 KLIF. Unfortunately, no one can be told what Wolfram Alpha is. You have to see it for yourself.
http://www.cinema.philips.com/?ls=us_en
Awesome visual effects on this 'advert'. Clowns vs Cops. Bullet time. What more do you need. Does anybody know of any Flash plug-ins for the BlackBerry Curve? To date, as far as I know, Flash-lite still doesn't run with BlackBerry's OS.
This post was a victim of the 3/11 sift-pocalypse, so here is a repost:
It was a bureaucratic pain-in-the-ass, but I have personally gathered the following economic data: Federal Interest Rate (1954-2009) http://www.federalreserve.gov Unemployment Rate (1948-2009) http://www.bls.gov Consumer Price Index (1913-2009) http://www.bls.gov Gross Domestic Product (1947-2009) http://www.bea.gov National Debt (1950-2009) http://www.treasurydirect.gov Federal Budget Receipts (1901-2009) http://www.gpoaccess.gov Federal Budget Outlays (1901-2009) http://www.gpoaccess.gov Federal Budget Balance (1901-2009) http://www.gpoaccess.gov National Imports (1960-2006) http://www.census.gov National Exports (1960-2006) http://www.census.gov National Trade Balance (1960-2006) http://www.census.gov Median Income (1947-2006) http://www.census.gov Mean Income (1947-2006) http://www.census.gov On either a monthly, quarterly, or annual basis, and used it to personally calculate: Rate of Inflation Real Gross Domestic Product Real National Debt Real Gross Domestic Profit (GDP - National Debt) Real Federal Budget Receipts Real Federal Budget Outlays Real Federal Budget Surplus/Deficit Real National Imports Real National Exports Real National Trade Balance Real Median Income Real Mean Income Where 'real' designates that the value has been adjusted for inflation. I've added all these values to a giant table, listed by month and year as far back as 1901, and used JMP to generate overlay plots of the various indicators versus each other. I have not seen a lot of this data over such a wide date range, and some of it never before, so let me just present it here for everyone to view and interpret... It has been brought to my attention that my video Top Gear: Communist Cars [http://www.videosift.com/video/Top-Gear-Communist-Cars] is dead (thanks EDD). There's a live and complete version of the video at StreetFire [http://videos.streetfire.net/video/190-Top-Gear-Communist_205207.htm] but my star isn't shiny enough to use it. Can any friendly gold star members help me out?
Who else here enjoys TV programs such as Colossal Construction and other large scale construction shows? I love 'em, it's the mix of extreme engineering, master coordination, hard work, and ingenuity.
<code>
public class LetMeIntroduceMySelf { /** * @param args */ public static void main(String[] args) { // TODO Auto-generated method stub Introduce("NordlichReiter", "C#, JAVA, HTML, JAVASCRIPT, SQL, .net"); } private static void Introduce(String name, String languages) { System.out.println("My Name is: " +name +"and my languages are" + languages); } } </code> I wanted to get a gather on what kind of tech jocks we have on the sift. I mostly do work in C#.net, but I'm going back to get a Sun Certification. I don't have a CS degree, so I need something to my name. In that I invite any one here to drop a bio, and hit us with open source projects if you have any. Give us some insight to your frustrations or prowess. Java is my weak point, today I just learned how to make JAR files. Now I need to learn how to port them to other platforms. This has been proposed before, but it was answered with resounding silence both times:
Is it possible to work some AJAX magic to expand the video summary of a video in the same way one can expand the comment section without leaving a video listing / the front page? A lot of videos have long descriptions that are worth reading, but clicking "more inside" or the video title introduces in my view unnecessary load times. It also allows for a more fluid sift experience to get as much information about each video as possible while minimizing the number of page loads. I am.
The two CGI cartoon gals making out under the banner "Live the Lifestyle You've Always Dreamed Of" don't really speak to me. Not after the first 30 times I saw it. Is it Dag's way of getting us to want charter membership to remove the ads? If you're sick of it too, maybe if we can all pledge to click on it, they'll make enough from the site and go away. But then again, that may get them to stay longer. Just rantin'. Can the Sift get a Tag Cloud?
(i.e.: )Not sure where it could go (I'm sure the more impolite of you have some ideas to mention in your comments where I could put it), but it could help some come across a popular topic here on the sift they wouldn't have otherwise. I'll bet big tags that would come up are: (cut from my comment on this post) What other topics you think will be big? Functionality dept.: perhaps tags can be drawn together to be counted with the name of the channels as well. (it would suck if "obscure" didn't come up because it was already listed in the channels). Also duplication of the channel name and the tag for a single video should be discounted (i.e.: a video with the tag "comedy" and the channel assignment "comedy" should only count 1 toward the "comedy" tag.) Google Blogoscoped blog has a tip on starting videos at a specific time.
I thought it would be useful for some videos, such as the popular "5th grade reporter asks Joe Biden "What a does a VP do?" where the pertinent point of the video is 3m45s (or 225 seconds) in to the video. Essentially you add: &start=225to two parts of the embed code of the video after: &fs=1 I've posted an example of it working here, where I start the video 15 seconds in: http://engineering.videosift.com/video/Tim-McGraw-ejects-unruly-fan-continues-song I know it's a bit technical, but I've come across some videos that would greatly benefit from this tweak. Perhaps those who are familiar with embed tweaking can give this tip in some comments to the videos. Just a thought. Here is an idea:
The Front sift should indicate with its posted videos, what order number they have in the sift. If you're like me, you want to make sure you don't miss your chance to view a sifted video. A few days away from the Sift, and you're hunting down the last video you left off and catching up on the latest ones. Sometimes it's not so easy, with pages 1 to 5 no longer having the same videos as others get pushed down the line. ... more inside ... If each video indicated what number they were, you can keep track where you left off and make sure you get up to speed. I suggest that videos, like that last one, indicate in small among its other info (published by...how long ago • with how many views, and the tags), it's order number in the Sift (#43295) with perhaps a link to those pages in reverse order to the latest video (#43295 with the latest 10, say up to #43305). Just suggestin'. Hope this wasn't too complex. Its Official I have the dumb:
![]() I just cannot figure it out, why IE Explorer shows the image fine, and Fire Fox doesn't, cross platform programming is difficult some times. Hey, I usually wouldn't do this, but this problem has plagued me for some time, and I will explain. But first let me show you my code: This is how it is represented in fire fox, and IE.
This is the method that saves and image and then plugs it in as HTML
When the button is pressed, the label text should change to a image tag and display an image. But it works in IE, and then does not work in Fire Fox. Maybe the HTML is malformed? I wish I could put this in the rage channel, because I am suffering from Code Rage, and I sit in a public office area... so I have to go outside to curse. Any help would be great! EDIT: \" or \\ these are escape from code characters.. allows the text to contain punctuation normally reserved for compiler activities. Example: string test = "he said\"Look at this sift talk, its complete crap\""; Output: he said\"Look at this sift talk, its complete crap\" string test = "he said"Look at this sift talk, its complete crap""; OutPut: SYNTAX ERROR EDIT: go here to learn how to denote punctuation as html code. Character Entities | Top Sift for Nov 7th, 2009Newest Channel Talk Posts 1. The new stargate on hulu.com (1sttube Talk) 2. Got Fired Today... (Happy Talk) 3. Top 10 Game-Show Moments [Videos] (History Talk) 4. Anyone into document management? (Geek Talk) 5. 15 Best 'Fresh Prince of Bel-Air' Moments (History Talk) 6. Vote for the best Sesame Street segments (History Talk) 7. Finally Saw "Moon" (Scifi Talk) 9. When movies are watched backwards (Cinema Talk) 10. The ZPI is a hilarious read (Horrorshow Talk) Subscribe Video Hosts We accept video submissions from the below hosts. If your favorite video provider is not available, please contact us to suggest it.
VideoSift Friends & Partners Useful Pages Top 15 Engineering Sifters of All Time Top 15 Engineering Sifters of the Past Week Current Users 1. NetRunner
2. looris
3. silvercord
4. JiggaJonson
5. IAmTheBlurr
6. oxdottir
7. mrfnk
8. EndAll
9. Njal
10. ElJardinero
11. Yogi
12. shponglefan
13. volumptuous
14. slint
15. xxovercastxx
16. Hybrid
17. dgandhi
18. 23b
19. calvados
|